Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
In “Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning,” Bates provides educators with extensive principles for creating effective digital learning experiences. The author discusses digital learning’s pedagogical theories, technology tools, and instructional design. The book covers digital learning subjects in depth, giving educators practical guidance and ideas for using technology to improve student engagement and learning. Since it emphasizes principles and concepts rather than implementation tactics, the book lacks empirical evidence or case studies to support its instructions. Despite this constraint, Bates’ straightforward and accessible writing style makes the book useful for instructors looking to improve their teaching with technology.
The book does not contain original research or a research methodology, rather Bates uses his significant education experience to provide practical insights and recommendations based on pedagogical principles and digital learning trends. Although the lack of a study methodology is a shortcoming, Bates’ expertise and experience lend credence to the recommendations. Bates is a useful resource for educators looking to improve their teaching with technology.
Bates’ work on digital technology in education is relevant to my research on nursing education and digital literacy. Bates’ principles can help create digital literacy and critical media analysis curricula for nursing students. Bates’ work also complements studies on digital learning environments, instructional design, and educational technology on how technology affects teaching and learning. Tony Bates, a distant education and educational technology expert, has written many books and articles on digital learning. Digital learning and instructional design instructors and researchers trust his work due to his academic background and experience.
Baker, B. & Yang, I. (2018). Social media as social support in pregnancy and the postpartum. Sex. Reprod. Healthc. 17, 31–34. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.003.
Baker and Yang’s article investigates the role of social media in providing social support to women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. The authors analyse how social media platforms can offer emotional, informational, and instrumental support to expectant and new mothers. The paper is well-structured and highlights the increasing relevance of digital communities in modern healthcare, which is a notable strength. However, a limitation is the lack of in-depth analysis of the potential negative impacts of social media use, such as misinformation or social comparison. The article adopts an empirical approach, drawing on data from various studies and surveys to support its arguments. This empirical focus allows the authors to present concrete evidence on how social media can serve as a valuable resource for pregnant and postpartum women. The use of data and case studies enhances the article’s credibility and provides a clear picture of the current landscape of social media use in maternal support. This article is particularly relevant to my research on the integration of digital tools in healthcare, especially in maternal health. It provides insights into how social media can be leveraged to support women during a critical period in their lives, aligning with arguments about the importance of accessible and diverse support systems in healthcare. Baker and Yang’s work underscores the need for healthcare professionals to recognize and potentially incorporate social media as a component of patient care and support. Baker and Yang’s research is valuable for healthcare practitioners, educators, and policymakers interested in the intersection of technology and healthcare. The authors’ academic credentials and their thorough analysis make this article a credible and authoritative source in the field of maternal health and digital support systems.\
Duke, V. J., Anstey, A., Carter, S., Gosse, N., Hutchens, K. M., & Marsh, J. A. (2017). Social media in nurse education: Utilization and E-professionalism. Nurse Education Today, 57, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.009
Duke et al. examine social media in nurse education and e-professionalism’s effects on nursing. The authors examine how social media platforms promote professional development, collaboration, and information sharing among nursing students and educators in nursing education programs. Survey data and qualitative interviews to examine students’ social media use in school make the article strong. One problem is the lack of consideration of social media hazards and obstacles in nursing education, such as privacy and ethical issues. Despite this constraint, Duke et al.’s paper sheds light on nursing education’s changing landscape and social media’s impact on professional identity and practice. Duke et al. used survey research and qualitative interviews to study nurse education and social media. The authors surveyed nursing students and instructors on their social media use and performed qualitative interviews to examine e-professionalism and social media literacy. Duke et al. examine social media use in nursing education using quantitative and qualitative methodologies, capturing trends and individual views. The research focuses on nursing education, but its methods and findings may apply to other areas interested in social media for professional development and learning. Duke et al.’s article provides empirical evidence on social media’s impact on nursing students’ professional development, which is relevant to my research. E-professionalism and social media literacy are part of nursing education debates concerning digital practice. Duke et al. illuminated the pros and cons of social media use in nurse education by studying students’ views and experiences. This provided significant information for educators and policymakers. The authors, Vickie J. Duke and colleagues, are experienced qualitative and mixed-methods nursing education researchers. For scholars studying social media in healthcare education, their paper is reliable due to their academic background and contributions.
El Yousfi, I., & Karaduman, I. (2019). The effects of social media influencers on consumer decision-making process: Study in Turkish fashion industry. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce, Economics and Management (IJRRCEM), 6(3), 99-105. Available at http://www.paperpublications.org
El Yousfi and Karaduman’s article explores the impact of social media influencers on the consumer decision-making process within the Turkish fashion industry. The authors examine how influencers shape consumer behavior, preferences, and purchasing decisions through their online presence and endorsements. The article effectively highlights the growing power of influencers in modern marketing, which is a significant strength. However, the study is limited by its geographic focus, which may affect the generalizability of the findings to other markets or industries. The research employs a quantitative approach, utilizing surveys and statistical analysis to gather and interpret data on consumer responses to social media influencers. This empirical methodology provides robust evidence supporting the authors’ claims about the influence of social media personalities on consumer decisions. The detailed statistical analysis enhances the article’s reliability and provides a clear understanding of the trends within the Turkish fashion market. This article is pertinent to my research on digital marketing and consumer behaviour. It offers valuable insights into how social media influencers can drive consumer decisions, aligning with discussions on the importance of digital strategies in contemporary marketing practices. El Yousfi and Karaduman’s findings emphasize the need for businesses to engage with social media influencers to effectively reach and influence their target audiences. El Yousfi and Karaduman’s work is a valuable resource for marketing professionals, business educators, and researchers interested in the dynamics of digital influence on consumer behavior. The authors’ academic backgrounds and thorough analysis make this article a credible and authoritative source in the study of social media marketing and consumer decision-making processes.
Idowu, A., Deji, S. A., Aremu, O. A., Bojuwoye, O. M., & Ofakunrin, A. D. (2015). Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women attending antenatal clinics in Ogbomoso, South West, Nigeria. International Journal of Maternal and Child Health and AIDS (IJMA), 4(1), 47-56.
Idowu et al.’s article investigates the level of birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Ogbomoso, South West Nigeria. The authors analyze various factors influencing these preparedness levels, including socio-demographic variables and healthcare access. The article’s strength lies in its comprehensive examination of birth preparedness and the practical recommendations it offers for improving maternal health outcomes. However, a limitation is the study’s focus on a specific geographical area, which may limit the applicability of its findings to other regions. The research employs a cross-sectional study design with quantitative data collection through structured questionnaires. This empirical approach allows the authors to gather concrete data on the preparedness and readiness levels among the women surveyed. The statistical analysis provides clear insights into the factors that affect birth preparedness and complication readiness, enhancing the article’s reliability and validity. This article is highly relevant to my research on maternal health and prenatal care practices. It provides valuable insights into the importance of antenatal education and support in ensuring better health outcomes for mothers and babies. Idowu et al.’s findings underscore the need for healthcare systems to prioritize birth preparedness and complication readiness as essential components of maternal care. Idowu and colleagues’ work is a crucial resource for healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and researchers focused on maternal and child health. The authors’ academic credentials and the rigorous methodology employed in the study make this article a credible and authoritative source in the field of maternal health and antenatal care.
Ipekoğlu, E. (2022). Exploring the effect of social media influencers on buyer decision process in context of insta-moms [Master’s thesis, İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi]. İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi Tez Koleksiyonu. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=tqUiYt63sTQLTpozMJ92Qg_JxTivPJ6UC_hfrDbA-hFMsN7Lf1DpG9fgxn8qFQn6
Ipekoğlu’s master’s thesis examines the influence of social media influencers, specifically “insta-moms,” on the buyer decision process. The study focuses on how these influencers affect consumer behavior and decision-making, particularly among mothers on Instagram. A notable strength of the thesis is its in-depth analysis of a specific influencer category and its impact on a targeted demographic, providing detailed insights into the mechanics of digital influence. However, a limitation is the focus on a niche segment, which might not be representative of the broader influencer market. The research employs both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, including surveys and interviews, to collect data on the impact of insta-moms. This mixed-methods approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the influencers’ role and provides robust evidence to support the thesis’ claims. The detailed analysis of survey data and interview responses enhances the study’s credibility and provides a nuanced view of the influencer-consumer dynamic. This thesis is particularly relevant to my research on digital marketing and consumer behavior, offering valuable insights into the role of social media influencers in shaping purchasing decisions. Ipekoğlu’s findings contribute to the discussion on the effectiveness of influencer marketing strategies and the importance of targeted marketing efforts in reaching specific consumer groups. Ipekoğlu’s work is a valuable resource for marketing professionals, researchers, and academics interested in the intersection of social media and consumer behavior. The rigorous academic approach and the focus on a growing area of digital marketing make this thesis a credible and authoritative source in the field of social media influence and consumer decision-making.
Jorge, A., Garcez, B., Carvalho, B., & Coelho, A. (2023). Parenting on Celebrities’ and Influencers’ Social Media: Revamping Traditional Gender Portrayals. Journalism and Media, 4(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4010008
Jorge et al.’s article explores how celebrities and influencers depict parenting on social media, particularly focusing on the reinforcement or transformation of traditional gender roles. The authors analyze content from various social media platforms to understand how parenting roles are presented and perceived in the digital age. A key strength of this article is its critical examination of gender portrayals, which provides insight into contemporary shifts or continuities in gender norms. However, a limitation is the potential bias in content selection, which may influence the generalizability of the findings. The research employs a qualitative content analysis approach, examining social media posts to identify themes and patterns related to gender portrayals in parenting. This methodology allows the authors to provide a nuanced analysis of how influencers and celebrities contribute to or challenge traditional gender roles. The detailed thematic analysis enhances the article’s depth and provides a clear picture of current trends in social media representations of parenting. This article is relevant to my research on gender roles and digital media, offering valuable perspectives on how social media influencers shape public perceptions of parenting. Jorge et al.’s findings highlight the role of digital content in either reinforcing or challenging traditional gender norms, contributing to broader discussions on gender and media studies. The authors work is a significant resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners interested in the intersection of gender, media, and parenting. The authors’ academic credentials and the thorough qualitative analysis make this article a credible and authoritative source in the study of gender portrayals on social media.
Laestadius, L. I., Van Hoorn, K., Wahl, M., Witt, A., Carlyle, K. E., & Guidry, J. P. (2023). Promotion of an Algorithm-Based Tool for Pregnancy Prevention by Instagram Influencers. Journal of Women’s Health. 5(2), 12-27.
Laestadius et al.’s article examines the promotion of an algorithm-based pregnancy prevention tool by Instagram influencers. The study explores how influencers communicate and endorse this tool to their followers, assessing the impact on public awareness and attitudes toward pregnancy prevention methods. A notable strength of the article is its focus on the integration of technology in health promotion, providing insights into the effectiveness of digital endorsements. However, a limitation is the potential variability in the influencers’ presentation styles, which may affect the consistency of the message delivered to their audience. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of engagement metrics with qualitative content analysis of influencer posts. This comprehensive methodology allows the authors to capture both the reach and the qualitative impact of the influencers’ promotions. The detailed examination of engagement data and content provides robust evidence of the influencers’ effectiveness in promoting the pregnancy prevention tool. This article is pertinent to my research on digital health communication and the role of social media influencers in public health promotion. It offers valuable insights into how digital tools and influencer endorsements can be leveraged to enhance health education and prevention strategies. Laestadius et al.’s findings underscore the importance of carefully designed influencer campaigns in health communication. Laestadius and colleagues’ work is a significant resource for health communication professionals, policymakers, and researchers interested in the intersection of digital media and public health. The authors’ academic backgrounds and the rigorous analytical approach make this article a credible and authoritative source in the field of health promotion and digital media studies.
Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology. Routledge.
Lupton’s book explores how digital media impact social structures, identities, and activities through sociological lenses. The author studies online communities, digital identities, surveillance, and health technology in digital sociology. A strength of the book is its interdisciplinary approach, which uses sociological ideas and concepts to evaluate digital occurrences across settings. However, the book’s minimal concentration on empirical research and case studies may restrict its practicality. Though limited, Lupton’s book offers subtle insights into digital culture and society through theoretical viewpoints on digital technologies’ social effects. Lupton’s work examines digital technology and societal phenomena using qualitative and theoretical methods. The author analyses digital culture and society using current literature and theoretical frameworks, providing a complete overview of digital sociology’s core topics and issues. Although it lacks empirical data or unique research, the book provides useful theoretical insights into digital technologies’ societal impacts. The book relies on theory to synthesize literature and conceptualize digital technology-sociological phenomena. Lupton presents a solid theoretical foundation for digital sociology, but empirical investigations testing theoretical principles in real-world contexts could benefit future research.
Meier, S. (2020). Reproductive Health Decision-Making: Extending the Shared Decision-Making Model into the Community (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).
Meier’s doctoral research examines reproductive health decision-making in the community utilizing the Shared Decision-Making (SDM) model. Interdisciplinary research on reproductive health decision-making using healthcare and community studies is a strength of the dissertation. Due to its localized focus, conclusions may not be generalizable. Despite this constraint, Meier’s dissertation sheds light on reproductive health decision-making and emphasizes the necessity for community-based approaches to healthcare decision-making. Meier’s dissertation uses qualitative research methods, including interviews and focus groups, to examine reproductive health decision-making in a community setting. A participatory approach involves community people in the research process to ensure relevance and validity. While the dissertation lacks empirical data and statistical analysis, it gives rich qualitative data and in-depth insights into reproductive health decision-makers’ experiences and viewpoints.
Qualitative research concepts guide the dissertation’s participant interaction and in-depth study of life experiences. Interviews and focus groups help Meier understand reproductive health decision-making from different viewpoints. To improve transparency and rigour, the dissertation should disclose methodological constraints and reflexivity. Community involvement in reproductive health decision-making facilitates collaborative, patient-centered care, according to Meier. The dissertation emphasizes the need to apply the SDM model to community-based interventions that address socio-cultural aspects affecting health decisions. Meier’s dissertation is pertinent to nursing, especially reproductive health and patient-centered care. The study emphasizes the importance of community engagement and collaborative decision-making in improving health outcomes and reducing healthcare inequities. Meier helps patients gain empowerment and autonomy in healthcare decision-making by applying the SDM paradigm to community settings.
Research on collaborative decision-making and community-based healthcare solutions informs Meier’s dissertation. Patient-centered care models are increasingly valued, and the study supports attempts to incorporate patient viewpoints and socio-cultural elements into healthcare decision-making. Meier’s findings add to reproductive health decision-making research and shed light on community involvement’s impact on health. Purdue University doctoral candidate Dr. Meier studies community health and healthcare decision-making. Her research focuses on patient participation, collaborative decision-making, and community-based health initiatives. Meier’s interdisciplinary research on healthcare delivery and patient experiences is informed by her nursing and community studies backgrounds. Meier’s dissertation illuminates reproductive health decision-making and the importance of community involvement in healthcare outcomes. The study emphasises patient-centered care and collaborative decision-making in nursing practise and research, despite its community orientation. Meier’s interdisciplinary approach and participatory research methods make her findings relevant and applicable, contributing to nursing and healthcare discussions.
Namyssova, G., Tussupbekova, G., Helmer, J., Malone, K., Mir, A., & Jonbekova, D. (2019). Challenges and benefits of blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 2(1), 22-31.
Namyssova et al. examine the pros and cons of blended learning in higher education, concentrating on online and face-to-face instruction. Students’ perspectives and experiences with blended learning are examined to determine its effectiveness and uptake. Its empirical focus on survey data and qualitative interviews to gather varied blended learning viewpoints is a strength. Given the study’s higher education context, conclusions may be limited in generalizability. Despite this constraint, Namyssova et al.’s research sheds light on blended learning implementation and higher education teaching and learning. Namyssova et al. study the pros and cons of blended learning in higher education using survey research and qualitative interviews. Structured surveys and qualitative interviews are used to acquire quantifiable data on students’ impressions and experiences with blended learning. Namyssova et al. explain the phenomenon by triangulating information from numerous sources.
Namyssova et al.’s mixed-methods methodology fits the study objectives and allows for a comprehensive look at blended learning in higher education. The authors improve study validity and reliability by combining quantitative survey data with qualitative interview findings. However, sample selection and data collection techniques may be discussed more explicitly to address methodological limitations and biases. According to Namyssova et al., blended learning in higher education has pros and cons depending on instructional design, technical infrastructure, and student participation. Faculty development and pedagogical support are crucial to student success in blended learning, according to the study. Despite its challenges, blended learning may improve student learning and encourage active learning. Namyssova et al.’s study on instructional design and technology-enhanced learning is important to education. The research addresses higher education blended learning issues and provides educators and instructional designers with practical advice. The study addresses critical blended learning strategy implementation and effectiveness challenges in varied educational settings by investigating students’ perspectives and experiences.
In line with blended learning and technology-enhanced education literature, Namyssova et al.’s research draws from education, psychology, and IT. The study provides empirical evidence and theoretical insights into blended learning’s problems and rewards, adding to higher education’s innovative pedagogical research.
In education, instructional design, and technology-enhanced learning, the study writers are experienced researchers and educators. Interdisciplinary skills and academic contributions boost research credibility and rigour, demonstrating a dedication to higher education knowledge advancement. Namyssova et al. collaborate on research with complementing abilities and viewpoints from diverse fields.
Namyssova et al.’s study illuminates the pros and cons of blended learning in higher education, emphasizing the need for good instructional design and pedagogy. In a specific setting, the study emphasizes the relevance of student participation and technology infrastructure in blended learning experiences, which has larger implications for educational practice and policy. The authors’ mixed-methods analysis deepens their understanding of blended learning strategy implementation.
Pretorius, K., Johnson, K. E., & Rew, L. (2019). An integrative review: understanding parental use of social media to influence infant and child health. Maternal and child health journal, 23, 1360-1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02781-w
The integrated review by Pretorius, Johnson, and Rew examines how parents utilize social media to affect newborn and child health and how digital platforms affect parenting and health behaviours. The study synthesizes research on parental social media use’s motivations, behaviours, and perceived advantages and hazards. The review’s interdisciplinary approach, using healthcare and communication studies to analyze social media use and parental decision-making, is a strength. However, the narrow focus on certain social media platforms or cultural contexts may limit generalizability. Despite this restriction, Pretorius et al.’s research improves understanding of how social media affects parental infant and child health behaviours.
Pretorius et al. synthesize qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies on parental social media use and newborn and child health in an integrative review. From comprehensive literature searches to data analysis, the authors find common themes and patterns among investigations. Pretorius et al. present a thorough assessment of parental social media participation and health-related decision-making by integrating findings from multiple sources.
Pretorius et al.’s integrative review methodology is suitable for synthesising parental social media use and newborn and child health literature. Their study is more reliable and valid since the writers use transparent and reproducible methodologies. However, the review might benefit from a more extensive consideration of study flaws and limits, notably methodological quality and bias risk. The authors conclude that social media influences parental attitudes and behaviours about newborn and child health, including information-seeking, decision-making, and health practices. The analysis highlights the need for healthcare practitioners to recognize and manage digital platform problems and possibilities by identifying major motives and concerns driving parental social media activity. Social media may help parents support and share knowledge, but the authors stress the need of evidence-based methods and avoiding disinformation and commercial interests. Pretorius et al.’s integrative review is important for maternal and child health, health communication, and digital media studies. The study covers how social media affects parental decision-making and health-related behaviours, with consequences for healthcare practitioners, legislators, and researchers. The review synthesizes findings from multiple studies to better understand the complicated relationship between social media use and parental practices in baby and child health.
Powell, J., & Pring, T. (2024). The impact of social media influencers on health outcomes: Systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116472
Powell and Pring’s systematic review examines how social media influencers affect health outcomes and health-related behaviours and attitudes. The study reviews social media influencer marketing’s effects on public health and consumer behaviour. The review’s extensive empirical and theoretical coverage provides a sophisticated understanding of social media influencers’ complicated effects on health outcomes. However, the narrow focus on specific health issues or population groupings may limit generalizability. Despite this restriction, Powell and Pring’s research adds to the literature on digital marketing and health communication, emphasizing the need for evidence-based influencer marketing regulations to protect public health. Powell and Pring search relevant databases for studies on social media influencers and health outcomes using a systematic review methodology. The review method is rigorous and transparent because the authors pick studies using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Powell and Pring summarize current research on social media influencer marketing and health effects by combining findings from multiple sources. Powell and Pring’s systematic review methodology effectively synthesizes literature on social media influencers and health outcomes, meeting study objectives. Their study is more reliable and valid since the writers use transparent and reproducible methodologies. However, the review might benefit from a more extensive consideration of study flaws and limits, notably methodological quality and bias risk. Powell and Pring found that social media influencers influence health-related behaviours and attitudes, including consumer decisions and views of health products and services. The review identifies persuasive communication and social influence mechanisms that influence health outcomes. Influencer marketing may promote health messages, but the authors emphasize the need for regulatory monitoring and ethical principles to reduce hazards and preserve public health. Powell and Pring’s systematic review is important for public health, health communication, and digital marketing. This study analyzes how social media influencers affect health behaviours and attitudes, with consequences for policymakers, healthcare practitioners, and marketers. The review synthesizes findings from multiple studies to better understand how digital influencers affect health-related decision-making and consumer behaviour. Powell and Pring’s study on digital marketing, social media, and health communication is interdisciplinary, drawing from public health, communication studies, and marketing research. The study highlights the need for evidence-based initiatives to promote responsible digital marketing and consumer health in influencer marketing ethical and regulatory considerations. Powell and Pring are public health, communication studies, and digital marketing experts. Their interdisciplinary expertise and intellectual contributions strengthen the research and demonstrate a commitment to health communication and digital media study. Powell and Pring collaborate on research with complementing abilities and viewpoints from different fields.
Powell and Pring’s systematic study shows how social media influencers affect health outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for evidence-based influencer marketing regulations to protect public health. The study focuses on digital marketing, but its conclusions apply to health communication and consumer behaviour research. Authors’ systematic review methodology improves reliability and validity, offering a thorough overview of social media influencers’ complicated effects on health-related behaviours.
Ventola C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 39(7), 491–520.
Ventola examines healthcare workers’ social media use, including its pros, cons, and best practices. Social media can improve healthcare professionals’ communication, collaboration, and networking, facilitating knowledge transfer and continuous education. It also warns about patient confidentiality breaches, unprofessionalism, and disinformation. The article’s extensive coverage of healthcare social media’s many effects is a strength. Lack of empirical evidence or case studies may limit the conversation. Although limited, Ventola’s article offers significant insights and practical advice for healthcare practitioners navigating social media use in their practise.
Ventola’s article evaluates healthcare professionals’ social media use based on literature and expert perspectives. The author covers pertinent studies, guidelines, and best practices rather than presenting unique research. While lacking actual data, the article supports its claims and recommendations with a wide range of authoritative sources. Ventola examines healthcare workers’ social media use using literature and expert perspectives in this review paper. While it does not contain novel research, the article covers the benefits, hazards, and best practices of healthcare social media use. However, empirical investigations on how social media use affects healthcare workers’ behaviours and patient outcomes may assist future research. Ventola finds that social media benefits healthcare practitioners by facilitating communication, collaboration, and professional development. She also stresses the need of recognizing and reducing risks including patient confidentiality breaches and unprofessionalism. The article offers healthcare professionals ethical and practical advice on using social media to improve practice. Ventola’s article on professional ethics, communication, and technology is pertinent to healthcare. The article discusses healthcare workers’ social media use and offers advice for doctors, educators, and legislators. The essay helps explain the complicated dynamics of digital communication in healthcare by highlighting the pros and cons of social media use. Ventola’s article draws on medicine, pharmacy, ethics, and communication studies to discuss healthcare social media use. The essay contributes to ethical, legal, and professional issues surrounding healthcare practitioners’ social media use, highlighting an increasing need for rules and best practices. Clinical pharmacist and healthcare communications specialist Dr. Ventola specializes in pharmaceutical practice, medical writing, and healthcare marketing. Her clinical and communications skills gives her a unique perspective on healthcare social media use. Ventola’s knowledge lends legitimacy and importance to her writing, informing healthcare professionals and educators. Ventola’s paper covers healthcare workers’ social media benefits, hazards, and best practices. The article synthesizes literature and expert opinions rather than conducting original research, however it offers significant insights and recommendations for healthcare social media use. Ventola’s analysis emphasizes ethical, responsible, and evidence-based social media use in professional practice due to her pharmacy and healthcare communications skills.
Yap, S.-F., & Lim, W. M. (2024). A Paradox Theory of Social Media Consumption and Child Well-Being. Australasian Marketing Journal, 32(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582221139492
Yap and Lim’s paradox theory examines the complex relationship between digital media use and children’s psychological and social well-being. Social media can improve or harm child well-being based on content exposure, usage behaviours, and personality. The article’s theoretical framework, which unifies opposing views on social media and child development, is strong. Lack of empirical evidence or longitudinal investigations to test the paradox theory is a problem. Despite this restriction, Yap and Lim’s article sheds light on the complex consequences of social media on child well-being, emphasizing the need for more research and critical reflection on childhood digital media use. Yap and Lim’s theoretical article explains social media’s paradoxical effects on child well-being. The paradox hypothesis is based on literature and theoretical ideas from psychology, sociology, and communication studies. The essay provides a theoretical foundation for future research and hypothesis testing in this field without empirical evidence. Yap and Lim’s theoretical piece synthesizes and analyzes social media use and child well-being literature and viewpoints. The paper provides a complete review of children’s digital media experiences’ complicated dynamics without empirical proof. Further study could benefit from practical investigations testing the paradox theory’s predictions and applying it to other cultural and socioeconomic circumstances. Yap and Lim found that social media use can have both beneficial and negative effects on child well-being, creating a paradoxical link between digital media use and psychological outcomes. Context and individual characteristics are crucial to understanding how social media affects children’s development. Social media can promote learning, socializing, and self-expression, but it also risks cyberbullying, privacy invasion, and excessive screen time. Healthy digital media use in children requires a nuanced grasp of these relationships, according to Yap and Lim. Yap and Lim’s article is important for developmental psychology, child health, and media studies. The essay adds to conversations concerning digital media’s effects on children’s psychological and social development by suggesting a paradox theory of social media consumption and kid well-being. Yap and Lim’s theoretical framework provides a new perspective for researchers and practitioners studying social media’s complex effects on kid well-being. The paper also stresses the necessity of evaluating individual characteristics, environmental circumstances, and usage patterns when measuring children’s digital media use. Yap and Lim synthesize literature and theoretical perspectives to provide a theoretical foundation for empirical research and intervention strategies to promote healthy digital media habits and reduce child well-being hazards.Lim’s article is important for developmental psychology, child health, and media studies. The essay adds to conversations concerning digital media’s effects on children’s psychological and social development by suggesting a paradox theory of social media consumption and kid well-being. Yap and Lim’s theoretical framework provides a new perspective for researchers and practitioners studying social media’s complex effects on kid well-being. The paper also stresses the necessity of evaluating individual characteristics, environmental circumstances, and usage patterns when measuring children’s digital media use. Yap and Lim synthesize literature and theoretical perspectives to provide a theoretical foundation for empirical research and intervention strategies to promote healthy digital media habits and reduce child well-being hazards.
Zile, V. (2021). Parental influence on Gen Z’s online buying behavior. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8(10). https://www.jetir.org
Zile’s article investigates the impact of parental influence on the online buying behavior of Generation Z. The study examines how parents affect the purchasing decisions of their Gen Z children, considering factors such as parental guidance, financial support, and value transmission. A strength of the article is its focus on the interplay between parental influence and digital consumer behavior among young individuals, providing a nuanced understanding of family dynamics in the context of online shopping. However, a limitation is the lack of a diverse demographic representation, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. The research employs a quantitative approach, using surveys to gather data on Gen Z’s online purchasing habits and the extent of parental involvement. This empirical methodology allows the author to present statistically significant results that highlight the correlations between parental influence and Gen Z’s buying behavior. The use of survey data enhances the article’s credibility and provides a clear picture of the current trends in online consumer behavior within this demographic. This article is particularly relevant to my research on consumer behavior and digital marketing, offering valuable insights into the factors that influence Gen Z’s online shopping decisions. Zile’s findings contribute to the understanding of how family influence shapes digital consumer habits, aligning with broader discussions on the role of social factors in online commerce. Zile’s work is a valuable resource for marketing professionals, educators, and researchers interested in the dynamics of family influence on consumer behavior. The author’s academic background and the rigorous quantitative analysis make this article a credible and authoritative source in the field of consumer behavior and digital marketing studies.
